Message10347

Author	DanglingPointer
Recipients	DanglingPointer
Date	2015-10-11.08:29:41
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1444552182.53.0.537601887455.issue2411@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
datetime methods are not returning microsecond precision and are only displaying 000s How do I fix this? e.g. >>> datetime.datetime.now().isoformat() '2015-10-11T19:23:19.377000' >>> datetime.datetime.now() datetime.datetime(2015, 10, 11, 19, 23, 23, 862000) >>> datetime.datetime.utcnow() datetime.datetime(2015, 10, 11, 8, 24, 20, 467000)

datetime methods are not returning microsecond precision and are only displaying 000s
How do I fix this?
e.g.
>>> datetime.datetime.now().isoformat()
'2015-10-11T19:23:19.377000'
>>> datetime.datetime.now()
datetime.datetime(2015, 10, 11, 19, 23, 23, 862000)
>>> datetime.datetime.utcnow()
datetime.datetime(2015, 10, 11, 8, 24, 20, 467000)

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2015-10-11 08:29:42	DanglingPointer	set	recipients: + DanglingPointer
2015-10-11 08:29:42	DanglingPointer	set	messageid: <1444552182.53.0.537601887455.issue2411@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-10-11 08:29:42	DanglingPointer	link	issue2411 messages
2015-10-11 08:29:41	DanglingPointer	create