Issue1103

classification

Title:	__tojava__ should work the same way on old-style and new-style classes
Type:		Severity:	normal
Components:	Core	Versions:

process

Status:	open	Resolution:
Dependencies:		Superseder:
Assigned To:	leosoto	Nosy List:	fwierzbicki, leosoto
Priority:		Keywords:

Created on 2008-08-11.21:59:40 by leosoto, last changed 2008-11-01.13:56:42 by fwierzbicki.

Messages
msg3423 (view)	Author: Leonardo Soto (leosoto)	Date: 2008-08-11.21:59:40
I added __tojava__ to Derived, without knowing that it was already supported on PyInstance. So now we have two different (and not exactly compatible) implementations for the same idea. The problem is that the PyInstance.__tojava__ didn't let the python-level __tojava__ a chance when the requested class was Object.class. I don't like this (and will break zxJDBC when datetime. or decimal.Decimal parameters are passed without explicitly setting the types as an extra argument).

msg3423 (view)

Author: Leonardo Soto (leosoto)

Date: 2008-08-11.21:59:40

I added __tojava__ to *Derived, without knowing that it was already
supported on PyInstance. So now we have two different (and not exactly
compatible) implementations for the same idea.

The problem is that the PyInstance.__tojava__ didn't let the
python-level __tojava__ a chance when the requested class was
Object.class. I don't like this (and will break zxJDBC when datetime.*
or decimal.Decimal parameters are passed without explicitly setting the
types as an extra argument).

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-11-01 13:56:42	fwierzbicki	set	nosy: + fwierzbicki components: + Core
2008-08-11 21:59:51	leosoto	set	assignee: leosoto
2008-08-11 21:59:40	leosoto	create