Issue1143
Created on 2008-10-04.07:07:22 by teratorn, last changed 2013-02-27.17:29:24 by fwierzbicki.
msg3641 (view) |
Author: Eric P. Mangold (teratorn) |
Date: 2008-10-04.07:07:21 |
|
In a particular project that I work on I have a normal, non-package
directory that happens to have the same name as a package that I need
to use from Jython.
It seems that since this directory is in the current working directory
when I start jython it is masking the real package of the same name.
I imagine this should be easy to reproduce. Let me know if I can help.
|
msg3709 (view) |
Author: Frank Wierzbicki (fwierzbicki) |
Date: 2008-10-27.18:22:16 |
|
I'm actually having a little trouble reproducing this. What version of
Jython are you using? Also, could you describe a minimal directory
structure that causes trouble? I tried an empty "foo" directory with a
sibling foo.py, and importing foo from another .py file worked. This is
using trunk on OS X.
|
msg3716 (view) |
Author: Eric P. Mangold (teratorn) |
Date: 2008-10-28.16:42:28 |
|
I just updated SVN and built jython. Still exhibiting the same behavior:
Archimedes ~/code % mkdir foo2
Archimedes ~/code % jython/src/shell/jython
Jython 2.5a3+ (trunk:5523M, Oct 28 2008, 11:33:53)
[Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (Sun Microsystems Inc.)] on java1.5.0_15
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import foo2
>>> foo2.__file__
>>> dir(foo2)
['__name__']
>>> foo2.__name__
'foo2'
>>>
I would expect "import foo2" to raise an ImportError since there isn't
any such package.
|
msg3818 (view) |
Author: Philip Jenvey (pjenvey) |
Date: 2008-11-23.02:47:45 |
|
Doh, this is due to our PathPackageManager attempting to handle Java
packages that might only contain other packages:
http://fisheye3.atlassian.com/browse/jython/trunk/jython/src/org/python/
core/packagecache/PathPackageManager.java?r=4040#l46
We should make this packageExists() check consider an empty directory to
not be a package -- but we would have the same issue for an empty
directory containing another directory. I'm not sure we can handle this
without some false positives
|
msg3835 (view) |
Author: Frank Wierzbicki (fwierzbicki) |
Date: 2008-11-23.14:10:00 |
|
I wonder if it would be too expensive to check to see if we are looking
at an entire empty directory tree?
|
msg7836 (view) |
Author: Frank Wierzbicki (fwierzbicki) |
Date: 2013-02-27.17:29:24 |
|
I suspect this will get resolved for better or worse when we implement http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0420/ for Jython 3.
|
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-02-27 17:29:24 | fwierzbicki | set | resolution: remind messages:
+ msg7836 versions:
+ Jython 2.5, Jython 2.7, - 2.5alpha3 |
2009-03-30 16:49:51 | fwierzbicki | set | assignee: fwierzbicki -> |
2009-03-14 14:26:26 | fwierzbicki | set | priority: normal |
2008-11-23 14:10:00 | fwierzbicki | set | messages:
+ msg3835 |
2008-11-23 02:47:46 | pjenvey | set | nosy:
+ pjenvey messages:
+ msg3818 |
2008-10-28 16:42:28 | teratorn | set | messages:
+ msg3716 |
2008-10-27 18:22:17 | fwierzbicki | set | messages:
+ msg3709 |
2008-10-27 18:20:19 | fwierzbicki | set | assignee: fwierzbicki nosy:
+ fwierzbicki |
2008-10-04 07:07:22 | teratorn | create | |
|