Issue1349
Created on 2009-05-15.09:26:45 by MartinTschoepe, last changed 2009-05-18.12:54:40 by otmarhumbel.
msg4685 (view) |
Author: MartinTschöpe (MartinTschoepe) |
Date: 2009-05-15.09:26:44 |
|
when having a file "foo/bar/a.py" in the jython path defining a class A
then an access to
foo.bar.a.A()
leads to an
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'a'
even when
from foo.bar import a
a.A()
works. Furthermore
from foo.bar.a import A
doesn't work as well.
This behavior has been found with the Rc2 of jython 2.5 binary.
|
msg4693 (view) |
Author: Oti Humbel (otmarhumbel) |
Date: 2009-05-18.12:50:23 |
|
Please find a sample CPython 2.5.1 session below:
C:\>python
Python 2.5.1 (r251:54863, Apr 18 2007, 08:51:08) [MSC v.1310 32 bit
(Intel)] on win32
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> foo.bar.a.A()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
NameError: name 'foo' is not defined
>>> from foo.bar.a import A
>>> foo.bar.a.A()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
NameError: name 'foo' is not defined
>>> import foo
>>> import foo.bar
>>> import foo.bar.a
>>> foo.bar.a.A()
A was created
<foo.bar.a.A instance at 0x01A4E0D0>
>>>
|
msg4694 (view) |
Author: Oti Humbel (otmarhumbel) |
Date: 2009-05-18.12:51:12 |
|
And now the same statements in Jython 2.5 rc2:
C:\stuff\jython\jython-2.5rc2>jython
Jython 2.5rc2 (Release_2_5rc2:6341, May 11 2009, 17:07:28)
[Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (Sun Microsystems Inc.)] on java1.6.0_13
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> foo.bar.a.A()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
NameError: name 'foo' is not defined
>>> from foo.bar.a import A
>>> foo.bar.a.A()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
NameError: name 'foo' is not defined
>>> import foo
>>> import foo.bar
>>> import foo.bar.a
>>> foo.bar.a.A()
A was created
<foo.bar.a.A instance at 0x1>
>>>
|
msg4695 (view) |
Author: Oti Humbel (otmarhumbel) |
Date: 2009-05-18.12:54:40 |
|
IMHO the behaviour is absolutely consistent.
Please let us know if you can find a difference all the same.
Thanks !
|
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-05-18 12:54:40 | otmarhumbel | set | status: open -> closed resolution: works for me messages:
+ msg4695 |
2009-05-18 12:51:12 | otmarhumbel | set | messages:
+ msg4694 |
2009-05-18 12:50:24 | otmarhumbel | set | nosy:
+ otmarhumbel messages:
+ msg4693 |
2009-05-15 09:26:45 | MartinTschoepe | create | |
|