Issue1467
Created on 2009-09-14.12:55:18 by doublep, last changed 2013-02-19.21:12:29 by fwierzbicki.
msg5153 (view) |
Author: (doublep) |
Date: 2009-09-14.12:55:17 |
|
Tested with 2.5.0 and 2.5.1rc2. See also issue 1333.
Java code:
public interface Foo <Type>
{
Type getFoo ();
}
public class FooImpl implements Foo <String>
{
private String foo;
public String getFoo ()
{
return foo;
}
public void setFoo (String foo)
{
this.foo = foo;
}
}
Python code:
import FooImpl
x = FooImpl (foo = 'bar')
print x.foo
Result:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "foo.py", line 3, in <module>
x = FooImpl (foo = 'bar')
AttributeError: read-only attr: foo
Note that the template/generic (i.e. <Type>) seems to be essential.
Otherwise there is no bug.
|
msg5154 (view) |
Author: (doublep) |
Date: 2009-09-14.13:17:15 |
|
After some investigation, I've found out that Java itself doesn't
consider this 'property' as writable because of the generics erasure...
These Java pseudoproperties are really fucked up and I have had
uncountable problems with them :(
Should this be worked around in Jython or closed as wontfix because
that's the way Java "works"?
|
msg7699 (view) |
Author: Frank Wierzbicki (fwierzbicki) |
Date: 2013-02-19.21:12:29 |
|
I'd say it needs to be closed since it is how Java does it.
|
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-02-19 21:12:29 | fwierzbicki | set | status: open -> closed resolution: wont fix messages:
+ msg7699 nosy:
+ fwierzbicki |
2009-10-01 01:31:50 | pjenvey | set | nosy:
+ cgroves |
2009-09-14 13:17:15 | doublep | set | messages:
+ msg5154 |
2009-09-14 12:55:18 | doublep | create | |
|