Issue838244
Created on 2003-11-07.23:53:41 by otmarhumbel, last changed 2009-05-31.21:54:16 by pjenvey.
|
| File name |
Uploaded |
Description |
Edit |
Remove |
|
org-761177
|
otmarhumbel,
2003-11-07.23:53:41
|
|
|
|
|
bugtests-761177
|
otmarhumbel,
2003-11-07.23:54:47
|
|
|
|
|
| msg2304 (view) |
Author: Oti Humbel (otmarhumbel) |
Date: 2003-11-07.23:53:41 |
|
Please find attached two patches, created with Eclipse:
org-761177:
- created with root = jython/org
bugtests-761177:
- created with root = bugtests
- contains also .cvsignore (because of .project)
Best wishes,
Oti.
|
| msg2305 (view) |
Author: Samuele Pedroni (pedronis) |
Date: 2005-01-09.19:49:25 |
|
Logged In: YES
user_id=61408
if we go for this, we will need to advertize the backward
incompatible change.
|
| msg3585 (view) |
Author: Jim Baker (zyasoft) |
Date: 2008-09-14.05:59:16 |
|
Java objects in Jython don't have natural-order comparisons using
Comparable#compareTo, if they support it.
So in comparing two java.lang.Integers, we are not comparing with
respect to their value.
|
| msg4776 (view) |
Author: Philip Jenvey (pjenvey) |
Date: 2009-05-31.21:54:15 |
|
Charlie added Comparable hooks to PyJavaType which should fix this. This
test now passes but it also seemed to pass for me on a pre-PyJavaType
build. Anyway there's are other tests for this in
test_java_integration.test_comparable_delegation
|
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2009-05-31 21:54:16 | pjenvey | set | status: open -> closed
nosy:
+ pjenvey, cgroves
resolution: fixed
messages:
+ msg4776 |
| 2008-12-15 18:42:39 | fwierzbicki | set | components:
+ Core, - None |
| 2008-09-14 05:59:16 | zyasoft | set | nosy:
+ zyasoft
messages:
+ msg3585 |
| 2003-11-07 23:53:41 | otmarhumbel | create | |
|
