Message6356

Author	amak
Recipients	alex.gronholm, amak, basti1302, otmarhumbel, pekka.klarck, pjenvey
Date	2011-01-27.20:33:06
SpamBayes Score	1.7124092e-05
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1296160386.83.0.0281330522171.issue1697@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Has anyone had a chance to review my most recent commit on this issue. I think it is a better solution because 1. It re-enables the use of IPV6 where possible. 2. It catches the situations where IPV6 cannot be used safely. 3. Provides a workaround for such situations 4. Documents this as a known issue. If people agree, I'll close this issue.

Has anyone had a chance to review my most recent commit on this issue. I think it is a better solution because

1. It re-enables the use of IPV6 where possible.
2. It catches the situations where IPV6 cannot be used safely.
3. Provides a workaround for such situations
4. Documents this as a known issue.

If people agree, I'll close this issue.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2011-01-27 20:33:06	amak	set	messageid: <1296160386.83.0.0281330522171.issue1697@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-01-27 20:33:06	amak	set	recipients: + amak, otmarhumbel, pekka.klarck, pjenvey, alex.gronholm, basti1302
2011-01-27 20:33:06	amak	link	issue1697 messages
2011-01-27 20:33:06	amak	create