Issue1665260
Created on 2007-02-21.14:33:40 by hsk0, last changed 2007-02-28.19:03:40 by cgroves.
File name |
Uploaded |
Description |
Edit |
Remove |
test_types.py
|
hsk0,
2007-02-21.15:03:31
|
Added test case 6.7 Types module |
|
|
msg2649 (view) |
Author: howard kapustein (hsk0) |
Date: 2007-02-21.14:33:40 |
|
See bug details @ http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1661679&group_id=12867&atid=112867
The fix (types.java=SVN, typeshk.java=Fixed):
--- types.java 2007-02-21 09:29:28.550870200 -0500
+++ typeshk.java 2007-02-21 09:29:24.581942400 -0500
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
dict.__setitem__("TypeType", PyType.fromClass(PyJavaClass.class));
dict.__setitem__("UnboundMethodType",
PyType.fromClass(PyMethod.class));
- dict.__setitem__("UnicodeType", PyType.fromClass(PyString.class));
+ dict.__setitem__("UnicodeType", PyType.fromClass(PyUnicode.class));
dict.__setitem__("XRangeType", PyType.fromClass(PyXRange.class));
dict.__setitem__("StringTypes", new PyTuple(new PyObject[] {
|
msg2650 (view) |
Author: howard kapustein (hsk0) |
Date: 2007-02-21.15:03:32 |
|
I've attached a modified ...\Lib\test\test_types.py, adding test case 6.7 to verify the Types module. I modified the existing file but only added lines 764+
As there was a large existing test case I merely extended it rather than write a new JUnit test file.
File Added: test_types.py
|
msg2651 (view) |
Author: Charlie Groves (cgroves) |
Date: 2007-02-28.18:53:03 |
|
applied in r3126.
|
msg2652 (view) |
Author: Charlie Groves (cgroves) |
Date: 2007-02-28.19:03:40 |
|
I'm leaving the test_types modification out since I'm about to change a fair amount of that with the type system unification.
|
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2007-02-21 14:33:40 | hsk0 | create | |
|