Issue222877
Created on 2000-11-18.19:48:15 by bckfnn, last changed 2000-11-28.12:21:25 by pedronis.
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2000-11-18 19:48:15 | bckfnn | create |
Created on 2000-11-18.19:48:15 by bckfnn, last changed 2000-11-28.12:21:25 by pedronis.
Messages | |||
---|---|---|---|
msg203 (view) | Author: Finn Bock (bckfnn) | Date: 2000-11-18.19:48:15 | |
This is an elaboration of bug 263. With the following Java class package foobar public class Super { public Super() { System.out.println("Hi from Super"); } } if you try to run the following Python code: from foobar import Super class Sub(Super): def __init__(self): Super.__init__(self) It does not work (assuming that the CLASSPATH is set correctly and all), but emits the error "TypeError: invalid self argument" at the line that calls Super.__init__(self). However, if the Java class Super is in a jar file, then the Python code works. Also, if you do not call the superclass constructor explicitly and let the runtime system do it, then it works. This seems very strange to me, since although I can understand why finding classes might be different between jar vs. non-jar files (for example, it kind of makes sense why you can't do "from mypackage import *" unless mypackage is in a jar file), I would have thought that once a class was found it would be treated identically whether it was in a jar file or not. |
|||
msg204 (view) | Author: Samuele Pedroni (pedronis) | Date: 2000-11-28.12:21:25 | |
Instance of now fixed broken sys.path loading. |
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2000-11-18 19:48:15 | bckfnn | create |
Supported by Python Software Foundation,
Powered by Roundup