Issue403025
Created on 2000-12-27.20:46:30 by bckfnn, last changed 2007-12-02.22:16:43 by cgroves.
|
| File name |
Uploaded |
Description |
Edit |
Remove |
|
None
|
bckfnn,
2000-12-27.20:46:30
|
None |
|
|
|
| msg2078 (view) |
Author: Finn Bock (bckfnn) |
Date: 2000-12-27.20:46:30 |
|
In BytecodeLoader2 the protection domain of the jython runtime is used. This can be a security problem. This patch will instead use the protection domain of the proxy.
|
| msg2079 (view) |
Author: Finn Bock (bckfnn) |
Date: 2000-12-28.14:38:44 |
|
Updated the patch. Now a AccessControlContext is stored with the PyCode instance and used when calling the PyCode.
|
| msg2080 (view) |
Author: Samuele Pedroni (pedronis) |
Date: 2002-04-14.14:14:02 |
|
Logged In: YES
user_id=61408
Pointer in the middle of the corresponding
jython-dev discussion:
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/637252
[for future reference,
people are starting to ask for a more flexible
security support. ]
|
| msg2081 (view) |
Author: Samuele Pedroni (pedronis) |
Date: 2005-01-09.19:18:01 |
|
Logged In: YES
user_id=61408
this was a tentative patch, the problem it tries to address
is larget than
the patch, it also unclear how much people care and what we
can do without java lib support. Should not be applied. We
should probably close it and archive the thing somewhere
under the new sandbox module.
|
| msg2082 (view) |
Author: Charlie Groves (cgroves) |
Date: 2007-12-02.22:16:43 |
|
Closing as suggested.
|
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2000-12-27 20:46:30 | bckfnn | create | |
|
