Issue444911
Created on 2001-07-26.20:12:37 by pedronis, last changed 2001-07-29.14:59:53 by bckfnn.
|
| File name |
Uploaded |
Description |
Edit |
Remove |
|
patch_interp
|
pedronis,
2001-07-27.15:54:39
|
new patch - interp part (diff -u5) |
|
|
|
patch_jythonc
|
pedronis,
2001-07-27.16:25:58
|
new patch - jythonc part (diff -u5) |
|
|
|
| msg2112 (view) |
Author: Samuele Pedroni (pedronis) |
Date: 2001-07-26.20:12:37 |
|
This should do the job.
! not tested ...
|
| msg2113 (view) |
Author: Samuele Pedroni (pedronis) |
Date: 2001-07-26.21:53:04 |
|
Logged In: YES
user_id=61408
So as it is, it doesn't work. To really and correctly
solve the problem and have the same semantic as CPython
we should change the way we compile imports.
I can fix this with a quick hack, for the meantime, better
than nothing: we gain in a direction and we lose in the
other (wrt. to CPython comp).
|
| msg2114 (view) |
Author: Samuele Pedroni (pedronis) |
Date: 2001-07-27.15:54:39 |
|
Logged In: YES
user_id=61408
OK, I have changed the way we compile imports <wink>.
|
| msg2115 (view) |
Author: Samuele Pedroni (pedronis) |
Date: 2001-07-27.16:25:58 |
|
Logged In: YES
user_id=61408
jythonc part of the new patch.
|
| msg2116 (view) |
Author: Finn Bock (bckfnn) |
Date: 2001-07-27.18:53:26 |
|
Logged In: YES
user_id=4201
Looks good. It passes all my tests. We should have done
this ages ago. Please commit it.
|
| msg2117 (view) |
Author: Finn Bock (bckfnn) |
Date: 2001-07-29.14:59:53 |
|
Logged In: YES
user_id=4201
I have checked it in.
|
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2001-07-26 20:12:37 | pedronis | create | |
|
