Issue862707
Created on 2003-12-19.04:32:31 by lycotic, last changed 2005-07-01.01:11:53 by fwierzbicki.
|
| File name |
Uploaded |
Description |
Edit |
Remove |
|
patch2
|
lycotic,
2003-12-19.04:32:32
|
|
|
|
|
| msg2313 (view) |
Author: Randy Brown (lycotic) |
Date: 2003-12-19.04:32:31 |
|
This patch carries over __future__ generator/division
declarations to eval()/execfile()/etc. There was some
support before, but because the flags didn't make it into
function scopes, they didn't make it all the way through.
eval() also had a special case ignoring this, but it was
referring to (defunct) support for turning on nested scopes
(they're always on now).
CPython 2.1 test_long_future.py now passes.
I'd put more direct testing for this in, but I'm not sure
exactly where. A test_j*.py in Lib/test? Something in Lib/
test/bugs?
|
| msg2314 (view) |
Author: Samuele Pedroni (pedronis) |
Date: 2004-01-05.02:41:28 |
|
Logged In: YES
user_id=61408
thanks,
I know that not getting patches reviewed immediately can be
upsetting. I will review them when I have a first cut at
starting new-style classes support,
it seems I have a stretch of time over the next two months
to start working on that. It's a major road block so ...
I hope it pans out
|
| msg2315 (view) |
Author: Samuele Pedroni (pedronis) |
Date: 2005-01-09.20:05:48 |
|
Logged In: YES
user_id=61408
I remember thinking that there's was a slightly better
organization to enable this, anyway there's a failing test
and things can be refactored later.
|
| msg2316 (view) |
Author: Frank Wierzbicki (fwierzbicki) |
Date: 2005-07-01.01:11:53 |
|
Logged In: YES
user_id=193969
Applied.
|
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2003-12-19 04:32:31 | lycotic | create | |
|
