Message11267
First on the performance issue, I was interested to see so quickly adapted the script I had for reproducing the failure into a crude benchmark, attached. The results surprised me:
With new try catch 33.7049999237 secs
without 33.9839999676 secs
It sorts a 10000 element list 1000 times, within error about 1 sec they are exactly the same so it does indeed seem the JVM is very efficient with try catch which is nice to know. If anyone else wants to try it that would be good.
On the Java bug report, I submitted it via http://bugreport.java.com at the end of that process they say they will have a look and let you know. I haven't heard anything yet. Should I have submitted it by some other way? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2017-03-22 21:11:09 | jamesmudd | set | messageid: <1490217069.58.0.0190499885041.issue2399@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2017-03-22 21:11:09 | jamesmudd | set | recipients:
+ jamesmudd, zyasoft, jeff.allen, stefan.richthofer |
2017-03-22 21:11:09 | jamesmudd | link | issue2399 messages |
2017-03-22 21:11:09 | jamesmudd | create | |
|