Message2632
I don't think that making PyReflectedFunction apparent type the same as builtin function is a good idea, I have seen code
using the extra feature that were exposed through it. Subtyping may be a solution but long term PyReflectedFunction should not be the way to expose purely python stuff.
Also using super(.) this way is not the correct way to attach types, because it doesn't influence the mapping of the class itself to a type leading to inconsistencies.
|
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2008-02-20 17:18:38 | admin | link | issue1638982 messages |
2008-02-20 17:18:38 | admin | create | |
|