Message6083
I just tested the start-up time of 2.5.2b2 on Linux and Windows XP (different machines). I got both good and bad news, let's start with the former.
On Linux the start-up time has improved, but is still quite far away from 2.2. Running the same command as yanne in the original report gives these results:
2.5.2 beta 2:
real 0m53.332s
user 1m6.652s
sys 0m5.136s
2.5.1:
real 1m5.767s
user 1m35.698s
sys 0m6.288s
2.2:
real 0m28.580s
user 0m35.582s
sys 0m2.440s
The bad news is that on Windows the start-up time has gotten worse. I created a simple Python script to run similar test as on Linux. The average start-up time was 1.94s with 2.5.1 and 2.58s with 2.5.2b2. I don't have 2.2 installed on this machine.
Could the new start-up time regression on Windows be related to the recent jython.bat fixes? It was great to see that the problems we had reported are fixed (#1567 and #1599) but start-up time getting worse isn't so nice. Could the native Windows launcher (#1491) improve the situation? |
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010-09-20 20:08:10 | pekka.klarck | set | messageid: <1285013290.08.0.941502262107.issue1380@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-09-20 20:08:10 | pekka.klarck | set | recipients:
+ pekka.klarck, fwierzbicki, pjenvey, zyasoft, yanne |
| 2010-09-20 20:08:10 | pekka.klarck | link | issue1380 messages |
| 2010-09-20 20:08:09 | pekka.klarck | create | |
|
