Message7272

Here's a potential fix. We're replacing the Channels.newChannel wrapper with our own that will do more than one blocking read

The commented out read method doesn't quite do it, we need potentially multiple blocking reads to suffice the entire requested size in some cases

It might be worthwhile to make the initial TRANSFER_SIZE value equal to 'len' there.

I don't know why the the original wrapper is synchronizing the read. Buffers aren't thread safe. The Channels.newChannel wrapper is strange =\